https://docs.google.com/document/d/18pL9UYJcSJgSSUgs2PoTS9XZ90pKAyxa4PDBsa8dWQo/edit

Components and Framing Prompt (Critique of other’s work)

In my peer review work I provided many comments throughout this peer’s paper. Comment number 1 shows that I evaluated Evidence. I explained that I like how the peer used an real life example in his first paragraph. Comment number 2 shows that I evaluated Evidence because the peer had good ideas evolved around his supported argument. Comment number 3 shows that I evaluated Ideas because I stated that a typical idea needs to be expanded more in depth. Comment number 4 shows that I evaluated Ideas because I recommended introducing a specific quote in the text. Next, is comment number 5 that shows that I evaluated Local Feedback because I recommended taking a sentence out or try expanding more, so the reader can understand. Comment number 6 shows that I evaluated Local Feedback because I think my peer should expand there. Comment number 7 shows that I evaluated Evidence because I thought my peer did a great job showing evidence. Comment number 8 shows that I evaluated Organization because the writer needs to fix his sentence format. Comment number 9 shows that I evaluated Local Feedback because I thought the quote was too long and my peer should of broke it up in separate quotes. Finally, comment number 1o shows that I evaluated Ideas because I commented that my peer should expand on the conclusion and go back to his main ideas.